Transportation - Nov. 7, 2005
I. Answer Summary Report data
| |
| |
| - |
Most Used |
- |
Somewhat Used |
- |
Nuetral |
- |
Not Used |
- |
Don't Know |
|
| Useful - Not Useful |
Total |
|
| 1. |
Pedestrian |
62 |
| 6 |
41 |
5 |
9 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 10% |
66% |
8% |
15% |
2% |
|
| 2. |
Bicycle |
62 |
| 3 |
20 |
7 |
31 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 5% |
32% |
11% |
50% |
2% |
|
| 3. |
Transit - buses |
62 |
| 5 |
6 |
5 |
45 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 8% |
10% |
8% |
73% |
2% |
|
| 4. |
Automobile - carpool |
62 |
| 2 |
21 |
4 |
34 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 3% |
34% |
6% |
55% |
2% |
|
| 5. |
Automobile - single driver |
62 |
| 48 |
10 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 77% |
16% |
2% |
3% |
2% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| - |
Very Important |
- |
Important |
- |
Neutral |
- |
Not Important |
- |
Don't Know |
|
| Very Important - Not Important |
Total |
|
| 6. |
Develop rail/train program |
61 |
| 26 |
16 |
10 |
8 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 43% |
26% |
16% |
13% |
2% |
|
| 7. |
Improve county-wide bike system |
61 |
| 14 |
28 |
9 |
9 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 23% |
46% |
15% |
15% |
2% |
|
| 8. |
Improve surface streets (capacity & functionality) |
61 |
| 23 |
24 |
7 |
6 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 38% |
39% |
11% |
10% |
2% |
|
| 9. |
Add High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane to Highway 1 |
61 |
| 17 |
18 |
7 |
17 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 28% |
30% |
11% |
28% |
3% |
|
| 10. |
Add additional lane to Highway 1 |
61 |
| 28 |
12 |
4 |
15 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 46% |
20% |
7% |
25% |
3% |
|
| 11. |
Increase number of available buses - routes or frequency |
61 |
| 13 |
24 |
12 |
10 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 21% |
39% |
20% |
16% |
3% |
|
| 12. |
Establish dedicated busways and bus priority signalization |
61 |
| 12 |
17 |
19 |
9 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 20% |
28% |
31% |
15% |
7% |
|
| 13. |
Expand transportation demand management programs and regulations |
61 |
| 14 |
15 |
17 |
8 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 23% |
25% |
28% |
13% |
11% |
|
III. Survey Taker Summary Report Data
| Total Number of Survey Takers |
|
62 |
| |
| |
| Breakdown by Business Type |
| Community Organizations (Non-profits, Churches, Foundations) |
2 |
| Education |
4 |
| Finance |
3 |
| Food & Beverage |
5 |
| Health Care |
3 |
| Home Building |
2 |
| Hospitality |
2 |
| Manufacturing |
2 |
| Media |
1 |
| Professional Services |
19 |
| Real Estate |
5 |
| Retail |
1 |
| Technology |
5 |
| Transportation |
5 |
| Other |
3 |
| |
| Breakdown by Location |
| Santa Cruz |
41 |
| Scotts Valley |
7 |
| Watsonville |
6 |
| Aptos |
6 |
| Live Oak |
4 |
| San Lorenzo Valley |
3 |
| Soquel |
4 |
| Capitola |
3 |
| Outside Santa Cruz County |
3 |
| |
| Breakdown by Frequency Traveling from outlying parts |
| Multiple times a day |
12 |
| Daily |
20 |
| Multiple times a week |
21 |
| Less than one time a week |
9 |
| |
| Breakdown by Primary Destination |
| place of employment |
19 |
| other destinations related to business |
30 |
| school |
2 |
| shopping |
3 |
| leisure |
8 |
| |
| Breakdown by Mode of Transportation |
| Automobile Travel - Hwy 1 |
27 |
| Automobile Travel - County Surface Streets |
28 |
| Bicycle |
3 |
| Public Transit System |
3 |
| Pedestrian |
1 |
| |
| Breakdown by Auto Useage |
| Yes |
32 |
| No |
25 |
| No Opinion |
5 |
| |
| Breakdown by Quality of Life |
| very important |
46 |
| important |
10 |
| somewhat important |
5 |
| less than important |
1 |
| |
| Breakdown by Transportation System Functioning |
| very positively |
9 |
| somewhat positively |
9 |
| has no effect |
15 |
| somewhat negatively |
23 |
| very negatively |
6 |
| |
| Breakdown by Level of Satisfaction with Current Transp. system |
| highly satisfied |
3 |
| somewhat satisfied |
7 |
| neutral |
12 |
| somewhat dissatisfied |
20 |
| highly dissatisfied |
20 |
| |
© 2004, Santa Cruz Chamber of Commerce - Website Development by Fireteam Consulting
Times have changed, but the Chamber and its members continue to promote a prosperous Santa Cruz.
